Previous Page  17 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

IMPACT OF STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS IN CORRUPTION CASES AFFECTING EU FINANCIAL INTERESTS |

PAG.17

3.5

COMPARATIVE LENGTH OF SOL

The table shows a certain uniformity as to the length of SOL in the countries included in the report. The-

re are two relevant exceptions: one is Italy, where SOL for some specific crimes are comparativelymuch

shorter and not long enough to allow the judicial system to complete criminal proceedings before the

expiry of the limitation period. The other non-aligned country is Spain where absolute SOL are absent:

in Spain, some limitation periods seem short though, in practice, they only run until the indictment of

the accused person at the beginning of the judicial case, when they are interrupted. Other grounds for

interruption occur at later stages of the proceedings.

Corruption-related crime

32

Bulgaria Greece

33

Italy

Portugal

Romania Spain

R A R A R A R A R A

R

Active Bribery

10 15 15 20

34

6 7.5 15 22.5 8 16

10

Passive Bribery

10 15 15 20 6 7.5 15 22.5 8 16

5

Bribery for acts contrary

to office duties

10 15

35

15 20 10 12.5 15 22.5 8 16

Corruption in judicial acts

15 20 12 15 15 22.5 8 16 5 or 15

Extortion by public official

15 22,5 15 20 12 15 10 or

15

15 or

22.5 8 16

Embezzlement

10 15

36

15 20 10.5 13.12 15 22.5 8 16

10

Abuse of authority

10 15

37

5

38

8 6 7.5 15 22.5 8 16

5

Money laundering

10 15

39

15 20 12 15 15 22.5 8 16

10

30

This list of causes of suspension and interruption is not exhaustive.

31

This suspension occurs because the prosecution may not commence or continue

32

This table lists relative SOL (R) and absolute SOL (A).

33

As to Greece, the table shows SOL for felonies.

34

Law 1608/1950 on Financial Crimes Against the State provides for aggravating circumstances, in which case these terms

may be extended to twenty and twenty-five years respectively, where the perpetrator intends to gain profit to the

detriment of the State’s property. This provision does not only apply to active bribery but also to passive bribery, bribery

of judges, and embezzlement in the public sector.

35

Terms are fifteen (relative) and twenty-two and a half (absolute) for crimes classified under article 282.5 in conjunction

with article 282.2 of the Criminal Code.

36

See previous note with longer periods for aggravated crimes, depending on circumstances.

37

See previous note.

38

As for Greece, the offence of “breach of duty” is considered in place of “abuse of authority”.

39

See previous note. The longer limitation periods for this crime are fifteen and twenty-five years, respectively