Previous Page  24 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

5.2

HARMONISATION OF SOL

ACROSS THE EU

The disparity among Member States in relation

to their SOL regulations is an issue that is consi-

dered by the permanent talks over the potential

need to harmonise criminal law across the EU.

Whether such harmonisation should begin with

criminal principles or with procedural issues is

still under debate. Turning to SOL only, diffe-

rent views have been expressed by our experts.

Opinions differ because some experts (Bulgaria)

believe that the criminal law systems of Mem-

ber States are different in so many respects (of-

fences, procedures, etc.) that limited provisions

could be implemented only through a specific

EU Directive. Some experts think that the leve-

ling of SOL regulations across Member States

would be positive even if this is not a priority

in some countries (Spain), while other countries

(Romania) consider it a necessity, in particular

in relation to VAT, considering that this is one of

the main sources of the EU budget.

Some experts (Greece, Italy, Portugal) endorse

the idea of a wider harmonisation of substan-

tial and procedural criminal laws, a process that

still needs some time to develop. A first step

could be represented by the enhanced imple-

mentation of existing fundamental principles

and the repeal of national laws contrasting di-

rectly therewith.

5.3

STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS

AND VAT FRAUDS

Value added tax is one of the sources of income

of the EU budget, and all related frauds are a

natural concern for EU institutions.

Based on our analysis of national frameworks

and of practitioners’ opinions, there is no con-

cern that a case similar to Taricco might occur

in their countries because of the long SOL for

this kind of crime.

Italy is a notable exception: SOL are not long

(seven and half years for absolute SOL) and

the late discovery of crimes contributes to high

levels of impunity for tax evasion. Considering

that most tax frauds are revealed when tax

declarations are reviewed by fiscal authorities

a few years later, most of these cases come to

Court when they are very close to becoming

statute barred.

Greece is in a strange position because, despite

sufficiently long SOL for VAT fraud (at least with

regard to felonies) that would not inhibit their

prosecution, some cases that have recently

come to light show a national widespread pro-

blem in their detection. According to the 2015

Eurobarometer, at least half of companies in

Greece believe that tax fraud and non-payment

of VAT are the most widespread practice in the

country

48

.