Previous Page  53 / 69 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 69 Next Page
Page Background

The preventive role of the judiciary in protecting the financial interest of the European Union.

A comparative analysis for improved performance

51

affecting the businesses beyond the conviction sentence received, taking into account also that

publishing the sentence is an accessory penalty by itself.

However,

the database should allow contracting authorities to check in a simple way if the exclusion

grounds stipulated by the Directive 2014/24/UE and to some extent by the national legislation are

applicable to economic operators participating to tenders

(bidders, associated bidders, subcontractors,

third parties supporting the bidder to meet the selection criteria). Therefore,

the

database should

include:

Legal persons convicted for organized crime, corruption, fraud, money laundering, terrorism,

child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings

(grounds for exclusions stipulated

by Article 57 paragraph 1 of Directive 2014/24/UE) and the exact moment of the final court

decision.

Legal persons convicted

for a criminal offence in their country and punished

with debarring (a

ban from participation to public procurement procedures) and the exact period of the ban.

The ‘unreliable’ economic operators

,

on the model of the Lithuanian “List of Unreliable

Suppliers”

, including economic operators proposed by the contracting authorities after a

substantial breach of a contract causing the untimely termination of a contract or the legitimate

refusal of the contracting authority to pay the prices, if:

o

the economic operator does not dispute in court the contract termination or the refusal

of payment; or

o

the court upholds that the contracting authority decision has been lawful and due to a

substantive breach of contract on the part of the economic operator;

and always

o

the court agrees the breach of contractual obligations is serious enough to result in the

blacklisting of the economic operator.

The ‘untrustworthy’ economic operators

,

on the model of the Lithuanian “List of Suppliers that

have Submitted Fraudulent Information”,

including economic operators proposed by the

contracting authorities when they have concealed information or have given fraudulent

information about compliance with the qualification requirements or grounds for exclusion

during the tender procedures, the contracting authority can prove it by any legal measures and

(a) the economic operator does not dispute this in court; or (b) the court upholds the decision of

the contracting authority and (c)

the court agrees the breach of legal requirements is serious

enough to result in the blacklisting of the economic operator.

The recommended blacklist(s) should be based on the registration of economic operators convicted for

crimes and only after their conviction on a system of criminal liability, quasi-criminal liability or

administrative punitive liability for criminal offences. Therefore the recommendation is putting much

more weight on the role played by the judiciary.

C.

Alternatively, and temporarily (until the creation of the abovementioned database),

the European

Commission should analyse the possibility to: