Previous Page  32 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

CENTRE OF EXPERTISE IN JUDICIARY @ TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL ROMANIA

30

Sanctioning phase

Sanctions should not be limited to a declaration of guilt, but should also include appropriate and

effective civil and criminal sanctions, as well as the enforcement of those sanctions.

GAPS AND loopholes

Decisions are not enforced by the

competent bodies

Lack of objective criteria for the

identification of corruption proceeds/

assets to be recovered/ confiscated.

Limited international cooperation in

matters of extradition of persons convicted

for corruption and in tracing, freezing and

confiscating assets pertaining to persons

convicted for corruption in a different

jurisdiction.

Lack of information regarding the

enforcement of sanctions

Off-shore, safe heavens and banking

secrecy are used to hide the proceeds of

corruption

Reccomendations to

counter THEM

Legal framework for extended confiscation

is in place

The sanction is enforced immediately and

all cross-jurisdictional arrangements are in

place for international legal assistance

The respective authority in charge with

enforcing the criminal sanctions periodically

reports enforcement statistics

The national legal framework recognizes

decisions sanctioning corruption made

by other jurisdictions and enforces them

properly

Amnesty, reprieve and commutation

of sentence shall have dedicated legal

framework for corruption cases

Sanctioning decisions regarding corruption

are made publicly available to allow for

social sanctioning as well

Denial of entry for people convicted for

corruption in a different jurisdiction.