Previous Page  39 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

ENHANCING JUDICIARY`S ABILITY TO CURB CORRUPTION - A PRACTICAL GUIDE

37

Universal

Declaration of Human Rights

UNCAC

UNCAC - Technical guide

Bangalore principle for judicial conduct

33

Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary

34

Procedures for Basic Principles

35

Strengthening Judicial Integrity against Corruption

36

Guidelines on the role of prosecutors

37

UN Convention Against Transnational

Organized Crime

GRECO Evaluation

International

Covenant on Civil

and Political

Rights

Montreal

Declaration

38

Ibero-American Summit

39

American Declaration of the Rights

and Duties of Man

Mt. Scopus Standards

40

IBA Minimum Standards

41

Beijing Statement

42

European Charter

43

Recommendation No. R (94) 12

44

CM(2010)147

45

Opinion no. 3 of CCJE

46

Opinion no. 1 (2000) of CCJE

47

Limassol

Conclusions (CMJA)

48

Council

Framework Decision

2001/220/JHA

49

New Delhi

Standards

50

Siracusa Principles

51

The Cairo Declaration

52

Commonwealth principles on the three branches of

Government

African charter on human and

peoples’

Rights

Plan of action for Africa on

53

African union convention on preventing and combating

corruption

Combating corruption in Judicial

Systems

Asian Human Rights Charter

EC Green Paper

54

The Universal

Charter of the judge

Beirut Declaration

European Convention of Human Rights

ECHR -Civil Limb

55

ECHR – Criminal Limb

56

GCR 2007

57

Advocacy Toolkit

58

B39. Judicial officials cannot be

politically affiliated and cannot

perform duties in the executive

or other official body if these

affect their independence.

II.1.

pg.48

Value

4.11

A 8

A 9

R1: Part 2:

GPC3 R4:

14.1;

7.1,

7.2,

F.35,

F.37

P. 4, p. 29

P. 4, p. 17;

P. 5, p. 28,

p. 30; P.

6, p. 33; P.

6, p. 37

A. 36,

38,

39,

40

A.22

P. 27

, I

IMPARTIALITY

C1. The composition of the

court or judicial panel has to

be determined using objective

criteria.

II.1.

pg.48

P. 3, p. 2

P. 3, p. 14;

P. 4, p. 23

A. 11,

12

A. 45,

46

C2. There should be specific

rules to enable judges and

prosecutors to avoid conflicts

of interests and appropriate

procedures for judges and

prosecutors to withdraw from

cases.

IV pg.25

R2: Part

2: 4.4; R4:

13.2; R4:

13.2;

7.8,

8.2

G.44,

G.45

P. 3, p. 3

(c), V P. 3, p. 19

P. 4, p. 17,

p. 18; P. 6,

p. 37; P. 7,

p. 39

A.

21.3

C3. Situations in which a judge

or a prosecutor must step down

from a case […]

II.4.

pg.11

Value

2.5;

Value

4.4

P. 3, p. 3

(c), V

Pg.

29-31

Pg.

17-18

C4. The law contains special

provisions that entitle parties to

ask for a judge or a prosecutor

to withdraw from a case in

certain situations […]

Value

4.10

A 8

A 9 R4: 12.2

P. 1, p. 2

(f); P. 3, p.

3 (c), V

P. 3, p. 16

Pg.

29-31

Pg.

17-18

C5. The judge and the

prosecutor conducts the

proceedings always observing

that all the parties enjoy the

same rights and have the

possibility to exercise them

II.4.

pg.52

Value

5

pg. 3

R4: 12.2 A 14

,1.

P. 3, p. 1, V

P. 4, p. 17,

p. 18, p.

20, p. 21

A. 69

C6. All the parties are allowed to

respond to the evidence and are

treated equally

P. 4, p.17,

p.18, p.20,

p.21

A. 69

C7. The judges shall apply the

same analysis system of the

evidence to all similar cases

and impose the same sanctions

to similar crimes, irrespective

of the position or quality of the

parties. […]

pg. 10

R1: Part 1:

1.2.

P. 3, p. 3

(a), (b), V

C8. The judicial decisions

are always reasoned and the

reasoning includes sufficient

arguments to convince the

parties and any independent

reader that all the evidence has

been heard and analyzed on

the legal grounds on which each

of them has been accepted or

dismissed. […]

P. 3, p. 3

(f), V

P. 3, p. 14;

P. 4, p. 17,

p. 18, p.

20, p. 21;

P. 4, p. 23;

P. 5, p. 24

A. 6.1 Pg. 45 Pg. 21

INTEGRITY

D1. Judicial officials shall not

request, nor accept directly, or

through close relatives or any

other middlemen, any gift or

financial or non-financial reward

for performing their duties.

II.4.5

pg.18

6

Value

4.14

pg. 3

A 8

A 9

R2: Part

2: 6.1 R4:

14.1;

P. 3, p. 3

(a), V

D2. Undue influence and

corruption of judicial officials

are subject to prosecution and

sanctions. Prosecution and

sanctions apply both to the

judicial official being corrupted

and those exerting the influence

art.6 p.2

pg.7

A 8

A 9

R1: Part1:

1.2; 2.1 2.6;

R1: Part2:

GPC3

Part3:

1.3.1.;

R4:16

P. 1, p.

2 (d)

P. 4, p. 22