Centre of Expertise in Judiciary Team


Alic Saiciuc
Irina Lonean
Victor Alistar

Centre of Expertise in Judiciary

Tools for the global reformation of the judiciary and for increasing the capacity of the judiciary to sanction corruption



The preventive role of judiciary in protecting the financial interest of the European Union – a comparative analysis for improved performance

  • Cresterea integritatii si eficacitatii confiscarii bunurilor obtinute in mod ilegal – abordari europene

Enhancing integrity and effectiveness of illegal asset confiscation - European approaches



Comparative report at the level of three EU member states - Romania, Bulgaria and Italy - on legal and institutional practices in the confiscation procedure, with emphasis on efficiency and integrity.


The report identifies vulnerabilities in current legislation and provides recommendations.



Analysis of the legislation and context of the operation of the prescription of corruption offenses in a set of analyzes carried out at the level of 12 EU Member States.


The study assesses the magistrates' perception of the level of professional independence, as well as on the causes and circumstances that could negatively or positively influence the independence of the judiciary. This research serves as a basis for adopting effective measures to strengthen independence and the responsibility of the magistrates and to eliminate the negative aspects of the Romanian justice system.



The study assesses the magistrates' perception of the level of professional independence, as well as on the causes and circumstances that could negatively or positively influence the independence of the judiciary. This research serves as a basis for adopting effective measures to strengthen independence and the responsibility of the magistrates and to eliminate the negative aspects of the Romanian justice system.


Assessing the perception of magistrates on the independence of the judiciary to adopt effective measures to strengthen the independence and the responsibility of magistrates and eliminating the negative aspects of the Romanian justice system.


Transparency International Romania Studies